How to improve your forecast accuracy?
By Pascal Persyn on November 28, 2009 @ 12:16
0 Comments | Permalink | Subscribe to e-mail alerts
Tags: , buying clock, buying funnel, forecast accuracy, forecast visibility, funnel management, sales funnel, Sales-Process
How to questions from readers and customers prompted me to write an add-on to my previous post on funnel management.
The first thing that has to be said is that few companies have changed their sales approach in an appreciable way over the last few decades. Yet buyers are seeking to buy and not to be sold to for over a decade.
I still see sales trainings and managers telling their sales and to look at the sales cycle and behave in an way that is inward looking. Sales force automation (SFA) and customer relation management systems (CRM) haven’t really helped to convert the front-line in an outward looking mode and helping people to buy from them instead of being sold to.
I was pleasantly surprised to see one of the outcomes of the 2009 sales conference in Miami where the buying cycle emerged as the new standard for funnel management. I trust this to be a stimulus for all the Perpetos customers bringing this into practice since 2005. But their is still a long way to go. It is indeed the best way to get subjectivity out of your funnel, yet it demands a mind-shift of the whole sales organisation and another way for management to coach and interact with their sales team. They all must learn to ask way more questions and ‘really’ try to understand what the customer is saying.
The principle is simple: Ask the customer questions which allows you to know the readiness to buy of each individual in the decision making unit (DMU), align them all so that they move through the buying cycle in a synchronised way and adapt your actions to it.
A couple of tips to improve your funnel management:
- Stop tracking and discussing sales steps and process. Start using readiness to buy phases based on reactions and answers to questions from each individual involved in the buying process. Ideally start using the Buying Clock. Using the time on the clock is an easy way for implementing a, consistent used, common language.
- Are we asking for and tracking the next step or are we engaging the sales rep to first decide on the next objective to facilitate the buying process on a project level before deciding what the next step should be, when and with whom? Do we track this in our funnel?
- Track the pain level of the customer by also knowing the impact of the challenges on the customer. Is their a compelling reason or an urgent need?
- Has your sales rep access to the decision maker? Is he continuously involved in the process and kept up to date by the sales rep?
- Is the go-live date the most important date we discuss with the customer? Is it a fixed date and why or can it easily be postponed? Do we know and are we tracking the go-live date?
- Has the customer actually confirmed your solution fit and did we postpone drafting the proposal until that moment?
- Split the weight % in 2 distinct ones: project%=what is the probability of the customer actually buying and win% = the probability of you winning the deal.
- Are you tracking the most important mandatory buying criteria and what is the perceived scoring of the customer compared to the competition? Do you discuss ways to influence these buying criteria?
Finally:
- Convert your weighted funnel in a scenario based funnel on which you coach the sales rep.
- Engage in vivid 1:1 discusions with sales to set a continuous improvement process in motion.
Your benefit and result: An accurate forecast with a highly improved visibility.
Funnel management: admitting a pain doesn’t mean buying
By Pascal Persyn on October 23, 2009 @ 16:50
2 Comments | Permalink | Subscribe to e-mail alerts
Tags: , customer focused organisation, funnel management, hit-rate and cost of sales improvement, pipeline management, sales performance
The basis of a good quality funnel is one which is based on prospect readiness to buy!
The most often used funnels nowadays are still based on subjective input from sales. It’s amazing to see how many managers are using such a funnel to predict revenue and use it as the basis for budget exercises. This is the funnel that most people use yet it is a very outdated model. This type of funnel is an artificial invention taking the eye away from the prospect and puts the focus on sales actions.
The fact that doing something is putting the opportunity on a given point in the funnel is a totally wrong assumption. The thinking is flood. You can give company and product presentations, demo’s, send proposals even when asked, etc without achieving anything. The question is am I doing something which corresponds with the readiness to buy?
Here are the biggest funnel mistakes:
- input based on subjective sales rep input. The gut feeling of sales people in terms of funnel management are seldom correct because:
- they are to closely involved to have an overall view
- most sales are to much influenced by the opinion of their ’sponsor’ and/or last sales action
- they have too little visibility on what’s happening at decision level
- not enough, if at all, contact with the ‘real’ decision makers
- individual forecast building by using a percentage win-rate on each of the opportunities. Most funnels at sales rep level and even on corporate level have to little opportunities at the same stage with too much variation in size
- defined by selling activities: performing activities is not necessarily moving the opportunity closer to a decision
- lack of common definitions
- imposed as a reporting tool and not as a day to day self-coaching tool: The funnel will never be up to date or based on careful thinking if it is not in a format, and incorporated in the way of working, which influences the agenda and behavior of the sales rep
- tracking and reviews based on must win deals resulting in starved pipelines and pushing salespeople to do the right things at the wrong time.
Helping management and the VP sales to more accurately predict the revenue is to convert the funnel into a buying funnel which tracks the readiness to buy of the opportunity. This is even more true in more complex sales with quit an amount of people involved in the decision taking. Because each of the involved people have their own agenda and readiness to buy which must be synchronized in order to move the opportunity closer to a decision in the quickest way possible.
The mental stages a buyer is going through:
These phases are universal and cultural independent.
- execution of existing solution and not interested in any information or offering in that area
- executuion and interested: something triggered the person to want to know more about something
- Field of Tension: Starts with an admitted pain which evolves over time into an urgent need. This results in the decision to buy something
- Market Research: The prospect goes out to the market to search for potential solutions and vendors
- Hesitation: This phase starts when the prospect thinks to be convinced to buy what from whom. At his point the focus shifts from looking to the benefits and advantages of acquiring the solution to all what can go wrong after having bought.
- Implementation: This is the period during which the solution is being implemented.
- Execution: The solution is in full use until the cycle starts all over again.
Perpetos has converted these phases into a 24 hour buying clock™.
Some of the reported results you acquire by this system are:
- a true shift towards customer focused thinking and acting
- an objective pipeline with a much better accuracy
- improved internal communication based on the hours of the clock
- lower cost of sales (i.e. less multiple people meetings because sales and pre-sales exactly determine when their presence is needed)
- improved hit rate
- more balanced pipeline
Let my know your experiences!
5 strategies to improve sales performance
By Pascal Persyn on June 03, 2009 @ 19:59
0 Comments | Permalink | Subscribe to e-mail alerts
Tags: , funnel management, hit-rate, lead generation, marketing effectivenes, Sales effectiveness, Sales efficiency, sales skills, sales tactics, value chain alignment
You typically have 2 main reactions of sales reps having problems to reach their quota. They start to:
- take excessive actions on their existing opportunities. They hope or are convinced to influence the outcome and decision date. These sales reps are typically faced with a starved pipeline. They will never experience the benefits of a balanced pipeline because of this. Moreover, they risk on ruining good opportunities by their behavior.
- call on more and more potential customers. They will take massive actions on each of them willing to have a meeting. This will lead to too many unqualified prospects in the pipeline and create time shortage at the same time. It will lead to a lot of good actions on the wrong prospect and/or wrong timing.
So in other words, both actions will never deliver consistent resolution in the long run.
5 strategies to overcome typical quota issues:
- Continuously qualify your opportunities:Is this really an opportunity? Will I be able to differentiate myself. Woun’t I be used to put pressure on the preferred vendor? Do I see a lot of similarities with already won projects? Will I be able to influence the buying criteria? Is a budget available or can it be made available. Can I get in contact with most or all decision making people? All of these are examples of qualifying criteria to make sure you spend time on the right accounts.
- Reduce your sales cycle: Stop using a sales-process. Use the buying clock. Think in terms of readiness to buy and adapt your actions and time between 2 actions. Who should be your next step contact? Use a structured way to prepare yourself. Think and report based on the outcome of your next steps instead of tracking the content of the next step. Keep all DMU members synchronized on their readiness to buy. Figure out typical time delays in the buying cycle and work ahead of time to overcome them.
- Increase your actual selling time:Figure out a way to decrease your admin time. Stop writing visit reports but send bullet-based short emails to your contact. Save them in your CRM and ask for feedback in order to stay in sync with your contact. Use CRM as your central repository allowing you to self-coach and become more effective.
- Build a pro-active opportunity pipeline over time:Make sure you work with marketing to create leads early in their buying cycle. This will allow you to educate them on their specific needed capabilities and link them to your differentiation. This will put the competition on the defence. It will lower your overall time spend per opportunity and increase your hit-rate at the same time.
- Improve your hit-rate: Get to know the impact your solution has on different people. Find the link between their specific problems, needed capabilities, benefits and results. Use that knowlegde to adapt your questions, value proposition and sales pitch to each of the individual contacts. Make sure you talk to decision makers (Source of Power), people negatively impacted by not having your solution (Source of Dissatisfaction) as well as influencers. Don’t make the mistake of having the project manager as your main contact. This is another reason why you need to get in early in de buying cycle. Add strategy 2 to the equation and you will experience massive improvement in your hit-rate.
The nice thing about these 5 strategies is that they create a snowball effect if you work on all of them at the same time. Make sure you share these ideas with your colleagues and help each other to become more effective with these strategies. Get pre sales support and marketing involved and create a value chain instead of trying to do all things by yourself. After all sales has become a team-sport.
