The basis of a good quality funnel is one which is based on prospect readiness to buy!

The most often used funnels nowadays are still based on subjective input from sales. It’s amazing to see how many managers are using such a funnel to predict revenue and use it as the basis for budget exercises.  This is the funnel that most people use yet it is a very outdated model. This type of funnel is an artificial invention taking the eye away from the prospect and puts the focus on sales actions.

The fact that doing something is putting the opportunity on a given point in the funnel is a totally wrong assumption. The thinking is flood. You can give company and product presentations, demo’s, send proposals even when asked, etc without achieving anything. The question is am I doing something which corresponds with the readiness to buy?

Here are the biggest funnel mistakes:

• input based on subjective sales rep input. The gut feeling of sales people in terms of funnel management are seldom correct because:
  • they are to closely involved to have an overall view
  • most sales are to much influenced by the opinion of their ’sponsor’ and/or last sales action
  • they have too little visibility on what’s happening at decision level
  • not enough, if at all, contact with the ‘real’ decision makers
• individual forecast building by using a percentage win-rate on each of the opportunities. Most funnels at sales rep level and even on corporate level have to little opportunities at the same stage with too much variation in size
• defined by selling activities: performing activities is not necessarily moving the opportunity closer to a decision
• lack of common definitions
• imposed as a reporting tool and not as a day to day self-coaching tool: The funnel will never be up to date or based on careful thinking if it is not in a format, and incorporated in the way of working, which influences the agenda and behavior of the sales rep
• tracking and reviews based on must win deals resulting in starved pipelines and pushing salespeople to do the right things at the wrong time.

Helping management and the VP sales to more accurately predict the revenue is to convert the funnel into a buying funnel which tracks the readiness to buy of the opportunity. This is even more true in more complex sales with quit an amount of people involved in the decision taking. Because each of the involved people have their own agenda and readiness to buy which must be synchronized in order to move the opportunity closer to a decision in the quickest way possible.

The mental stages a buyer is going through: These phases are universal and cultural independent.

• execution of existing solution and not interested in any information or offering in that area
• executuion and interested: something triggered the person to want to know more about something
• Field of Tension: Starts with an admitted pain which evolves over time into an urgent need. This results in the decision to buy something
• Market Research: The prospect goes out to the market to search for potential solutions and vendors
• Hesitation: This phase starts when the prospect thinks to be convinced to buy what from whom. At his point the focus shifts from looking to the benefits and advantages of acquiring the solution to all what can go wrong after having bought.
• Implementation: This is the period during which the solution is being implemented.
• Execution: The solution is in full use until the cycle starts all over again.

Perpetos has converted these phases into a 24 hour buying clock™.

Some of the reported results you acquire by this system are:

• a true shift towards customer focused thinking and acting
• an objective pipeline with a much better accuracy
• improved internal communication based on the hours of the clock
• lower cost of sales (i.e. less multiple people meetings because sales and pre-sales exactly determine when their presence is needed)
• improved hit rate
• more balanced pipeline

Let my know your experiences!